If, for example, your research was about finding the right proportions of two metals in an alloy and you tested ten different proportions, you do not have to list all the ten proportions: it is enough to say that the proportions varied from to .Compared to two other sections of a typical research paper, namely Methods and Results, Introduction and Discussion are more difficult to write.A second goal is to help the students master college level writing skills.I have found that meeting these goals through the assignment of a traditional research paper is problematic for two reasons.The differences can be simple: you may have repeated the same set of experiments but with a different organism, or elaborated (involving perhaps more sophisticated or advanced analytical instruments) the study with a much larger and diverse sample, or a widely different geographical setting.The earlier paragraphs should lead logically to specific objectives of your study.This concluding part of the Introduction should include specific details or the exact question(s) to be answered later in the paper.At the same time, the introductory statement should not be too broad: note that in the examples above, the Introduction did not begin by talking about agriculture, cancer, or batteries in general, but by mentioning organic matter in soil, the role of bacteria, and lithium ion batteries.
Three Paragraph Introduction: An alternative to writing a research paper Mark Giordano July 10, 2017 One goal of my interdisciplinary (but primarily social and natural science based) freshman proseminar is to develop the skills to identify a research question.
It requires convincing people that your issue is important (paragraph 1), explaining what information gaps exist (paragraph 2), and demonstrating that your paper will at least partially fill one or more of those gaps and perhaps what your research found (paragraph 3).
Writing paragraph 1 requires you to understand the context of your research.
First, students struggle to understand the difference between identifying a research gap and constructing a paper to fill the gap (e.g.
are the environmental impacts of dams always negative? we should build fewer dams), let alone actually do the research.