Next, the square deal went after the meat industry.
In the Neill-Reynolds Report of 1906, the meat industry was accused of insanitary food practices.
However, these ideas were never put into place even though they came from an influential progressive of the time.
Presidential candidates failed to unite party ideals and were too busy focusing on winning the election.This act set up an agency that regulated business’ actions and helped determined whether they were lawful or not.In a statement made by Herbert Croly in the New Republic, Croly questions Wilson’s effectiveness on leading reform.How many sincere progressives follow him (Wilson) in believing that this legislation has made the future clear and bright with the promise of best things? The reforms were critiqued and evaluated with some policies working and some failing but the time led to new ideas that shaped the industry.The progressive era highlighted issues within the national government that caused voters to think about the election process.These documents both stated the need for political reform with the progressive ideals of Roosevelt and the lowering percentages in each election.However, the progressives failed to unite the party’s ideas for reform in the politics of the early 20th century.With the election of Woodrow Wilson in the 1912, he sold his idea of “new freedom”.As stated in the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, “It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce that directly or indirectly discriminated in price between different purchasers…” “The effect of such discrimination may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce…” The act was put forth by President Wilson to encourage business competition.However, the act was attacked by the conservatives who caused it to not take full effect in legislation.However, a similar act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, took full force.